AI versus the Fine Artist
Perspective from a Professional Artist
If you are reading this, chances are, you have asked yourself this question:
What is the big deal about the AI art versus the Fine Arts?
As a professional artist who has spent years in the art business and selling all over the United States, this has become a research endeavor.
While AI art challenges and expands the boundaries of creativity with the use of technology, it also raises intriguing questions about the nature of art, creativity, and the role of artists in society; however, the silver lining is actually beginning to show itself…
Some Challenges AI Art presents
-
AI algorithms can demonstrate innovation in artistic techniques, such as style transfer, generative adversarial networks (frameworks), and other machine learning methods that create visually unique outputs.
-
AI can generate artworks that push the boundaries of traditional aesthetics, exploring novel styles and forms, and compositions that fine artists might not have imagined.
-
AI art challenges traditional notions of authorship, creativity, and the artistic process, stimulating philosophical and cultural discussion about the nature of art in this emerging digital age.
-
AI enables interactive and dynamic art forms, such as artworks that respond to real-time data inputs by individuals, enhancing viewer engagement and creating a unique experience.
However, there are still questions unanswerd
Meaningful Intention
-
AI-generated art may lack intentional meaning or emotional depth. While it can produce aesthetically pleasing images, it lacks the human narrative or intention that art-lovers often seek in art.
-
Fine art typically involves deliberate expression of ideas, emotions, or concepts, often reflecting the artist's personal experiences or societal commentary.
Depths of Creativity
-
AI-generated art often blurs the lines of authorship. Can an AI system truly create art, or is it the programmer or the dataset that deserves credit? This challenges traditional notions of creativity and originality.
-
Fine art traditionally emphasizes the artist as the sole creator, with individuality and personal expression being paramount.
The Creation Process
-
Critics debate whether AI-generated art should be evaluated by traditional aesthetic criteria or by the novelty and technical skill involved in programming the AI.
AI can generate vast amounts of art quickly, leading to questions about the value of scarcity and craftsmanship in traditional fine art.
-
Evaluation of fine art often considers its historical context, cultural impact, and technical skill.
Fine art often involves meticulous craftsmanship and skill honed over years, emphasizing the physical act of creation.
The Fine Artist
In short, the fine artist offers something that AI cannot. While AI is a cool “gadget,” it is merely operating on the creativity of the human mind and the minds before. AI generates images from existing information and applies it together, all at once - at the operation of human innovation.
But the fight for the arts isn’t over
What matters most, is how society will fight for the arts.
the conflict
As AI Art takes off, the Fine Arts have been rivaled. With the easy click of a button, someone can have a whimsical “painting” of their beloved pup, or a reconstruction of an era painted in their favorite art style.
But what they don’t have, is a painting, a masterpiece, or an insight produced by human emotion.
Something that takes years to master.
